Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think Uber had a pretty clear path to profitability prior to this. The only open question was could they raise prices enough to not drive customers away and not be undercut by Lyft. Lyft is in the same boat, so it would probably be like when airlines started charging for checked bags--once one does it, they all do. As for the demand curve? I think they could make it work. Like Wework, what Uber does is a real business. It just got over-hyped.


Lyft isn't their only competition. If they (Uber or Lyft) raise prices they will lose out on a lot of their appeal over traditional taxis. Cost relative to taxis is the main reason Uber and Lyft were successful in the first place.

Many taxi dispatches have already adapted to app based ordering, tracking and payments as well.


Yeah, both companies existed to "disrupt" the traditional taxi industry and I think they succeeded. Traditional cabs have changed a lot (while continuing to charge what rides actually cost).


Well, they exist(ed?) to make money. They did so by innovating in the taxi industry. One of them did this by breaking the law in every jurisdiction they operated in then lobbying to make their conduct legal after the fact.

But yes, they did disrupt the industry and there are now COTS solutions for taxi brokerages to accept rides in similar ways such as iCabbi.


That seems like a waste to point out. All companies exist to make money. That's kind of inherent in being a company. You wouldn't write "To make money" as your mission statement when opening a business.


>You wouldn't write "To make money" as your mission statement when opening a business.

I've made a huge mistake...




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: