Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Retail stores in the US are required to verify the age of those purchasing tobacco products and alcoholic beverages. They typically limit the types of identification they accept and they could lose their license to sell those products if they sell to those who are under age.

There's absolutely no reason why banks can't do something similar (actually more stringent) when extending a line of credit. The PATRIOT act in the US requires banks to verify the identity of those trying to open an account or secure a mortgage loan, so requiring something similar for lines of credit shouldn't be out of the question.

The root cause of the issue is the law I referenced in the comment[1] that started this subthread. If consumers were able to sue banks and credit bureaus for false information, then banks would have much more incentive to be more diligent. Right now, they can offer "identify theft protection" service where the consumer has to pay them instead. That doesn't give them incentive to be more diligent, and, quite possibly, has the opposite effect.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28194787



>Right now, they can offer "identify theft protection" service where the consumer has to pay them instead. That doesn't give them incentive to be more diligent, and, quite possibly, has the opposite effect.

That's just good vertical integration.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: