Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you taking into account the effects on sales of substitute goods?

If I pirate say a $500 graphics editing suite I can easily believe that does not represent a lost sale to the maker of that software. There is simply no way I'd buy a $500 graphics editing suite.

But it might represent a lost sale to Pixelmator, because if I could not pirate the $500 graphics editing suite and could not afford to buy it I would have turned to a less expensive solution, such as Pixelmator Pro which is $40 and I can afford.



If I download the GIMP, should that count as a lost sale to Pixelmator. Should the law somehow protect them from that?


That sounds more like a failure of marketing on Pixelmator's part.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: