Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> At any rate, my original comments seem to apply to countries like the US and UK that dominate in research.

Not really, at least not anymore. Depending on which metrics you choose to look at[1], China currently leads research output, and by a long stretch, over the US.

Meanwhile, within the EU Germany outperforms the UK by a considerable margin, and both India and Japan outperform the UK as well.

The UK fares even worse in papers-per-capita, ranking between the Czech Republic and Portugal.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of...

> Academics there have the power to stop serving paywall-and-overcharge academic publishing corporations. We know this, because they sometimes do, and those that do are often successful. But most choose not to.

Don't get me wrong, it's possible to overthrow the likes of Elsevier. The current push for public-access research is a significant step to eliminate the stranglehold these companies have on research output by abusing copyright laws. However, unlike the initial claim, this is no easy feat nor straight-forward.



> Depending on which metrics you choose to look at[1], China currently leads research output, and by a long stretch, over the US.

Nobody who knows anything of the content of the research underlying those metrics takes this seriously.


China does produce some very interesting computing-related papers FWIW. The few times I've been able to get an english version (or to have one translated) I was not under the impression they were qualitatively significantly worse than from any other place. Arguably that isn't hard because most papers in the field are absolute garbage, but I don't go into a paper expecting that to be the case.


> Nobody who knows anything of the content of the research underlying those metrics takes this seriously.

To be very charitable in my interpretation, your personal assertion is simply presumptuous and outright wrong. China outright dominates research in some key fields[1], and in some fields it's outright impossible to search through topics without getting search hits from china.

[1] https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/China-tech/China-s-research...


Tell me with a straight face that counting papers without regard to impact or journal is a good way to measure research impact.

Do you have any idea what they do to game those metrics?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: