> This is at the centerpiece of the ongoing lawsuits from newspapers against OpenAI: ChatGPT didn't just summarize articles, but appears to be capable of reproducing them verbatim[1].
Pieces of them, in random order, which was reconstructed into correct order by NYT, which knows the correct order.
Page 30 and forwards contain examples of regurgitated text that, to me, extend meaningfully beyond "pieces" or "random order"[1].
(But again: this is not at the heart of the argument above. The argument above is that any degree of training on public but pre-identified 0days undermines the "cutoff" claim, in a way that would be interesting to qualify in further research.)
Pieces of them, in random order, which was reconstructed into correct order by NYT, which knows the correct order.