I think the point is more that the noose is now tightening on these kinds of services. Real Debrid was the first top be targetted because they appear to be the biggest / most popular (from what comes across my monitor anyway), so I'd assume that wherever the bulk of those specific customers move to will be the next target.

(I don't totally grok what service 'Debrid' provides, but various people seem to rave about it. Currently looking up more information. Summary: Aggregator of premium access to a seclection of file hosting sites, plus caching of content that's popular amongst their Customers)

Sure, but each case has to be tried on its own merits. It’s a cat and mouse game, not a certainty of enforcement.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see that behavior of pirate streaming sites such as clones and (modified) limited hangouts as aspects of strategies to combat enforcement while segmenting the market to increase profits and/or limit exposure to downside risks.

Debrid services act as a shared cache of requested torrents/magnet links as well as digital locker services sold as upsells on a premium tier. It’s facilitated as a WebDAV API and/or direct HTTPS downloads generated via unique hashlists that encode magnet links.

It can be incorporated into search addons for things like Stremio or Kodi or Jellyfin or Plex so it’s basically just-in-time streaming from a cache that just-in-time downloads a torrent or digital locker file, backed by a time-based cache that usually is provided by the debrid provider, similar to how paid newsgroup providers advertise retention, but also with downward pressure to avoid long-lived links to avoid DMCA takedowns.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_hangout

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_segmentation