Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Taubes has been refuted so many times it's astonishing that anyone still cites him.

Compelling anecdotal evidence is an oxymoron, especially when the scientific evidence to the contrary is so strong.



I've seen some work contradicting him, but would be interested in seeing something refuting him.

Your phrase "Compelling anecdotal evidence is an oxymoron" seems strange. If 5 people told me they saw my wallet outside, I'd be compelled to check, by anecdote, if I'd dropped it on my way in.

Please show me your science.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: