Well, you could gold plate and tin shield every nanometer of conductor to make sure that no bit is ever lost...
OR you could, I don't know make some sort of algorithm that, I don't know calculated some sort of sum of every block of data transmitted and then, like checked the sum to see if it was right. You could retransmit the block if it wasn't since Gig-ethernet is what like 1000 times faster than cd audio?
My plastic cables available with this revolutionary data integrity algorithm on sale now for just $499.
I know someone who told me not to copy mp3s more than once, because quality gets worse with every copy. Moreover if you store mp3s too long the quality also decreases. This is known as a serious problem among audiophiles, because it prevents digital files from being archived for a longer time. (he REALLY meant it)
if you store mp3s too long the quality also decreases...
Well, depending on the underlying physical storage, there's a good chance that you'll see some data corruption on timescales ranging from a few years to a few centuries... so he's not COMPLETELY wrong. :-)
True, amongst other things, it depends on the fragmentation of the disk, if you listen to your mp3's after a defrag the highs are more pronounced; the soundstage better defined; the bass will improve in several subtle ways.
Hmm, might be a startup in selling an mp3-defragger. Of course you need to charge at least 666$ for anyone in the niche to take you seriously.
Monster Cables. I was with a friend buying a HDTV at BestBuy and the salesperson there tried repeatedly to get us to buy $75 HDMI cables from Monster. We just laughed. The scary thing is the salesperson's pitch "You just bought a fancy TV, want some fancy, 24K gold-plated cables to go with it." probably works on many consumers who don't know the difference.
The main question this raises in me is: isn't it illegal to claim such cables are better? Should we try to make it illegal to sell stuff at artificially inflated prices that are solely based on make belief, misinformation and a lack of knowledge in the customer? Would a class action lawsuit have any chance? In some sense, it's a con.
It would be tricky to get such a law right. They are better cables. No, seriously. (Or, at least they can be, I don't actually know if they really are better, but it's possible.) It's just that they way they are better doesn't matter, because for moving digital data around, having 10,000% of the necessary capacity/overhead/whatever is no better than having 101% of the necessary capacity. But the 10,000% cable is, in some sense, better, and you aren't going to be able to write a sensible law stopping a salesperson from building that "better" into a "shouldn't you buy this?".
"Due to the extreme speeds at which energy moves through the cable, it was no surprise that these effects would cause the cable housing to become quantum entangled with itself in space and time, thusly bringing the cable (interior and exterior) into its own self-generating time dilation field."
I'm certain that 500 meters of 10base-5 cost several times more than this cable.
This was the "original" popular ethernet. It was a coaxial cable about as big around as a finger and had a stripe around it every 2.5 meters. Wherever you needed a connection you found the nearest stripe, drilled into the cable until you just reached the core and inserted a special vampire tap attached to a transceiver the size of a shoe which sent another finger sized cable down to your device.
OR you could, I don't know make some sort of algorithm that, I don't know calculated some sort of sum of every block of data transmitted and then, like checked the sum to see if it was right. You could retransmit the block if it wasn't since Gig-ethernet is what like 1000 times faster than cd audio?
My plastic cables available with this revolutionary data integrity algorithm on sale now for just $499.