Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I believe the article mentioned femtosecond laser writing. I don't know how much data gets written in each pulse though.


"The experiments were performed with a femtosecond laser system Pharos (Light Conversion Ltd.) operating at 1030 nm and delivering 8 μJ pulses of 280 fs at 200 kHz repetition rate."

My €0.02 bet is that that means 200 kilobit per second. In layman's terms: about twice as fast as we could send data to Voyager 1 when it was near Jupiter aka 'abysmal'.


But use a hundred lasers in parallel and you're up to 20Mb/s!


"delivering 8 μJ pulses of 280 fs at 200 kHz repetition rate."

   8.0E-6 J * 2.0E5/s = 1.6 J/s = 1.6W
So, this laser outputs 1.6W of power (in very short pulses, but that is irrelevant here). Let's assume a LED powered laser. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_conversion_efficiency gives, optimistically, 35% efficiency for a LED. That would mean a single-laser version would use 5W, a 100-laser one 500W of input power.

=> Some improvements are needed before this replaces hard disks at home. We'll see whether there is room for that.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: