It's not pride of being born at a certain location (that's coincidence), It's pride to be part of a community (state, city, organization, ...) that makes good, rational decisions. Like how you can be proud if you live in a country with a sensible healthcare system or patent system, or proud to work at a company with good policies and a healty work environment.
Because hopefully you're part of this community by choice. I chose to move to Silicon Valley and be part of the community there precisely because I was dissatisfied with the communities I lived in prior to that; in effect, I vote with my time and taxes.
I agree that being proud of where you're born is silly; but being proud of where you chose to live is slightly different.
One of the advantages of living in a democracy means that you do get a say in who gets elected to make the laws. The main disadvantages are that other people do too, and that the pool of politicians you draw from is mostly unappetizing.
Probably a defensive reaction to all the negative comments made about a nationality... and to prevent the children(and even adults) of said nationality from internalizing the negativity. In short, to provide balance.
I guess if you are ancient and rich you could be proud of it . If your papers say you were born in an ancient and rich group but you're none, what should you be proud of ?
It really boils down to you as an individual vs the country you are enlisted in.
You can be proud of anything or anyone who you can identify with or somehow are connected with, without any accomplishment on your part.
You can be proud of your kids because they belong to you. You can be proud of your family because you belong to it.
You can be proud of your favorite sports team because you root for them.
BUT if you can be proud of it for its accomplishments, you also should be ashamed of it because of its errors.
Nationalists are people who love to claim the accomplishments of their country, but deny its errors.
EDIT: This is not to say that one has to mention all errors everytime one expresses pride.
The question is whether your children should be proud of the accomplishments of their parents. Presumably, you have some responsibility for the accomplishments of your children.
I think the EU directive has been much influenced by the CNIL and the preexisting french laws. The CNIL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNIL) was very influencial 20 years ago. It has lost most of its power now, but its main results remain.
My understanding is that CNIL works/worked on data privacy issues, which does not appear to be related to the issue of reverse engineering. You might be thinking about the Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications (2002/58) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_Privacy_and_Electr....
As far as I can tell the "French law" would be Article L122-6-1 of Code de la propriété intellectuelle which is dated 10 May 1994. The Eu Software Directive was first enacted in 1991. The text of the French law is almost verbatim the text of the directive.
It's even more explicit than the dates, the article was created by this law: "Loi n° 94-361 du 10 mai 1994 portant mise en oeuvre de la directive (C. E. E.) n° 91-250 du Conseil des communautés européennes en date du 14 mai 1991 concernant la protection juridique des programmes d'ordinateur et modifiant le code de la propriété intellectuelle"
It might be a good reason to be proud if you were a key founding member of the EU, but it's not nearly as impressive if it's just your favorite collective.
