Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I read many post-mortems, but this one, for some reason, struck me as being very frank and unforgiving in its assessment.


Still kind of shady (or is it just me??..): When they launched DrawQuest, Canvas was already dead. However they did not acknowledge this in any way. Today Canvas is still online while not having any proper audience or any changes to the site for like 2 years. All in all they got like $3.6 million for Canvas in funding without any income.

He writes it himself:

> we created DrawQuest after the failure of our first product, Canvas

Why keep it online for another 2 years if it failed? I don't get it.


Not sure about his case, but in my case I still keep my failed startup online (http://friendcameo.com/)

Mine failed in the sense that there's no way of growing or monetizing it in a way that's worth my time and effort. But at the same time, I can sometimes run experiments/surveys on it that allows me to learn and apply finding to other more successful ideas.

I'm guessing Canvas is along the same lines.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: