Is this the reason that so many of his recent posts were promoted on here? Was the intention to build the cachet of some widely read essays so he could credibly step in for PG?
No. We didn't manipulate the scores of these (or any other) posts. Presumably the reason Sam started writing a lot in 2012 was the same reason I started trying to recruit him then: he was finished working for Green Dot.
Your hypothesis and the one I floated aren't mutually exclusive.
My idea doesn't necessitate a conspiracy or playing with the points/ranking, which PG is rather quick to deny in his reply to me. It could have just been a plan for Sam to release blog posts over a period of time and try to get them read. I'm curious if this was a conscious effort to build something akin to http://www.paulgraham.com/articles.html given the role he was being groomed for. Of course, I'm also always curious about the way this site really works on the inside.
In that comment, he claims he is simply blogging to "practice writing." From the vantage point of this announcement two days later, that sounds coy, even obtuse.
I mean, they own the platform, they have active mods, and constantly float YC related news to the top and suppress news with particular keywords or from particular domains.
I love that PG thinks in historical terms. It's exciting to view yc as an institution that could outlive all of us, just as the great universities have.
But...but... Will PG still be at the interviews? I think that's what I'm afraid of most with this change. Paul had a sort of incite about people. What about Jessica Livingston? What if she follows. I'm happy for Sam and PG but, I feel it just won't be the same without him doing interviews and reviewing applications. Perhaps I'm being selfish (or have abandonment issues), I've always dreamed of one day seeing him at the interview table, whether rejected or accepted.
"they have 3 rooms [interviewing] at the same time. Each room has 2-3 partners in it. I got the one with Garry Tan and Paul Buchheit - it was super chill. We had a great conversation. They didn't drill me (or interrupt me) or anything. We covered most topics I wanted to cover. They let me guide the conversation.
On the other hand, PG and Harj (and other partners / venture partners) are in the two other rooms. Last year, I interviewed with PG (and 6 other people). It was hell. They kept saying my idea was bad, and we were arguing (it turns out that they were right...my idea was bad)."
That's why I like PG, he's upfront and brutally honest.
HN stories for his blog start about a year ago, a little after this article says the idea originally was floated (mid-2012), and they have pretty consistently frontpaged: http://hn.algolia.com/#!/story/sort_by_date/prefix/0/blog.sa...
It makes me wonder if it was a coordinated, planned effort.